Tuesday, March 1, 2011

The Basic Elements of a Legal Malpractice Case

In every type of lawsuit, a plaintiff (commonly known as the person bringing the case) must make certain allegations of fact against a defendant (the party being sued) and tie those allegations of fact to violations of specific laws or rules. Those violations could be based upon a particular statute or rule or section of law, or common law generally (some times the two overlap as well). If the plaintiff cannot prove that the defendant committed an “actionable” wrong, then the lawsuit will be dismissed by the court – either because there is a failure of proof or because the allegations of proof do not amount to a violation of law as interpreted by the court.


When a plaintiff brings an action against a lawyer for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must prove several basic “elements” of the cause of action for legal malpractice in order to prevail. Generally, the first requirement is that the party suing for legal malpractice show that he was the former client of the defendant, who is a lawyer. (It is important to point out that there are some cases which expand the definition of a client or extend liability to non-clients of the lawyer for purposes of legal malpractice claims).


A plaintiff in a legal malpractice case (the client of an attorney) must prove that:


a) the defendant-attorney failed to exercise the care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed and exercised by a member of the legal profession;


b) the defendant-attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of the loss sustained by the plaintiff-client;


c) the plaintiff-client incurred actual damages as a result of the defendant-attorney’s actions or inaction; and


d) “but for” the defendant-attorney’s negligence, the plaintiff-client would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have sustained any damages.


See, Opinion of the New York State Court of Appeals in Arnav Industries Inc. v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300.


For a defendant-attorney in a legal malpractice case to succeed on a motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss the cause of action for legal malpractice, evidence must be presented to the court on the motion which establishes that the plaintiff-client is unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the legal malpractice case.


See, Opinion of the Appellate Division in Crawford v. McBride, 303 AD2d 442.


Copyright 2006 and 2011 Richard A. Klass, Esq.
"Your Court Street Lawyer"


License Information

Creative Commons License
The Basic Elements of a Legal Malpractice Case by Richard A. Klass, Esq. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, please contact Mr. Klass (email: RichKlass@CourtStreetLaw.com). Insert the words "reprint permission request" in the subject line of the email.

Publishing Guidelines

Permission is granted to publish this article electronically in free-only publications, like a website or ezine (print and non-free publications require permission) as long as the resource box is included without any modifications. All links must be active. A courtesy copy is requested on publication (email: RichKlass@CourtStreetLaw.com).


Article Title:The Basic Elements of a Legal Malpractice Case


Article URL:http://courtstreetlaw.com/articles/legal-malpractice-articles/basic-elements-legal-malpractice-case.html


Author Name:Richard A. Klass, Esq.


Contact Email Address:RichKlass@CourtStreetLaw.com


Author's Firm's Website:www.CourtStreetLaw.com


Word Count:388 words



[This resource box must be included in any publications.]
* * *

Resource Box

About the Author:Richard A. Klass, Esq. maintains a law firm engaged in civil litigation at 16 Court Street, 29th Floor, Brooklyn Heights, New York. He may be reached by phone at (718) COURT-ST [(718) 268-7878)] or RichKlass@courtstreetlaw.com with any questions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.


Read the original article in context at:http://courtstreetlaw.com/articles/legal-malpractice-articles/basic-elements-legal-malpractice-case.html
Additional articles by Mr. Klass may be found at: http://courtstreetlaw.com/articles/index.html.
Back issues from Mr. Klass' quarterly newsletter, Law CURRENTS are available at http://courtstreetlaw.com/newsletters/index.html.


Articles from Law CURRENTS may be available for reprint. Please see individual articles for license information.






Contact me if you have questions.


Sincerely yours,
Richard A. Klass, Esq.
Your Court Street Lawyer
-----------
copyr. 2011 Richard A. Klass, Esq.
The firm's website: www.CourtStreetLaw.com
Richard A. Klass, Esq., maintains a law firm engaged in civil litigation at 16 Court Street, 29th Floor, Brooklyn Heights, New York.
He may be reached at (718) COURT-ST or e-mail to richklass@courtstreetlaw.com with any questions.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

No comments:

Post a Comment